Look, you should have understood yourself why Varg is most possibly correct on that PART of his story, the killing of Euronymous from what you have written down yourself. If Euronymous hadn't planned to kill him and it was only Varg that planned so, Varg would not have done it that way and get jailed, he would have done it secretly or even not at all because most propably people would figure it out with such a main figure such as Euronymous. Why was Snorre with Vikernes anyhow so then at that night?
Also Varg and that confirmed from a random source ( don't take that in account just saying) didn't seem to care for socializing ( on general though) with metalheads back then and attended techno clubs. This detail has resurfaced.
I am not basing my assumptions on these two facts, but euronymous has been known to be a cunt through several occasions, it is not exactly the figure you paint him to be. Occasions such as the killing of a Polish gay, that has been confirmed by various sources, also in one of the letters he says something in the lines of " I have borrowed money so I now we can continue on", I don't know from who, it may very well be Vikernes. This because little random details of Varg's story resurface ALWAYS from random chance, third persons etc both knowing Euro in person or not.
Many of the letters displayed in your own page ( sent by Euronymous), also interviews, confirm not generally the basis of Euro's character as described by Varg, but important details about events. I can't recall any more ATM. That is not to excuse Vikernes or so but to correct you on that certain part, I don't know wholly what happened but c'mon don't be a Euro fanboy and be a little more subjective.
To speak evenly of both sides, Varg's story seems consistent in several aspects, like combining technical details, that have resurfaced or not with an overall plan of the story and so on. Varg has also known to be inconsistent, yes, but what type of inconsistency is that and what it says about his character then and now I can't fully say. He is consistent at a certain rate with his views, but he isn't exactly the person he paints himself to be. That although doesn't mean that necessarily he killed Euronymous because of this reason. Many "inconsistencies" you have pinpointed down in your blog isn't exactly proof at any rate, such that at first he followed euronymous, how this consists of any type of direct proof for anything I can't see. Same goes with Varg having no regrets for killing him, I would do the same, it says nothing. Actually such minor details should normally be there either way. His perplexed overall views mean nothing again. He may have even forgotten details or remembered wrongly minor details after all these years, but his consistency on the basis of the story and his way of speaking through all these years again seems to outweight that. I don't know what was happening in his mind back then and what were his intentions and purposes for everything he did or if even at a certain moment he chased after a chance to kill euro, but if he was really threatened by euro as everyone would have done, he rightfully got rid of him, Euronymous is not the ideologue you present him to be. A good musician yes, with few interesting points but an ideologue since when?
In conclusion I don't even know what triggered Euronymous to plan to kill Varg, if that is true, which seems to be. Only them would know the full story. Euronymous however seems to have had more reasons to kill Varg. Vikernes can't lie even if he wanted to on major details, read his story aswell.
Varg is responsible for setting fire ( not himself but through others) on 4 churches, I'm certain about that, but what that says about him and if that is so brave, and what were his indirect purposes, ideological or opportunistic or both, I can't say for sure. The thing is that you can't nail him down for Euronymous killing just like that.
1 comment:
Look, you should have understood yourself why Varg is most possibly correct on that PART of his story, the killing of Euronymous from what you have written down yourself. If Euronymous hadn't planned to kill him and it was only Varg that planned so, Varg would not have done it that way and get jailed, he would have done it secretly or even not at all because most propably people would figure it out with such a main figure such as Euronymous. Why was Snorre with Vikernes anyhow so then at that night?
Also Varg and that confirmed from a random source ( don't take that in account just saying) didn't seem to care for socializing ( on general though) with metalheads back then and attended techno clubs. This detail has resurfaced.
I am not basing my assumptions on these two facts, but euronymous has been known to be a cunt through several occasions, it is not exactly the figure you paint him to be. Occasions such as the killing of a Polish gay, that has been confirmed by various sources, also in one of the letters he says something in the lines of " I have borrowed money so I now we can continue on", I don't know from who, it may very well be Vikernes. This because little random details of Varg's story resurface ALWAYS from random chance, third persons etc both knowing Euro in person or not.
Many of the letters displayed in your own page ( sent by Euronymous), also interviews, confirm not generally the basis of Euro's character as described by Varg, but important details about events. I can't recall any more ATM. That is not to excuse Vikernes or so but to correct you on that certain part, I don't know wholly what happened but c'mon don't be a Euro fanboy and be a little more subjective.
To speak evenly of both sides, Varg's story seems consistent in several aspects, like combining technical details, that have resurfaced or not with an overall plan of the story and so on. Varg has also known to be inconsistent, yes, but what type of inconsistency is that and what it says about his character then and now I can't fully say. He is consistent at a certain rate with his views, but he isn't exactly the person he paints himself to be. That although doesn't mean that necessarily he killed Euronymous because of this reason. Many "inconsistencies" you have pinpointed down in your blog isn't exactly proof at any rate, such that at first he followed euronymous, how this consists of any type of direct proof for anything I can't see. Same goes with Varg having no regrets for killing him, I would do the same, it says nothing. Actually such minor details should normally be there either way. His perplexed overall views mean nothing again. He may have even forgotten details or remembered wrongly minor details after all these years, but his consistency on the basis of the story and his way of speaking through all these years again seems to outweight that. I don't know what was happening in his mind back then and what were his intentions and purposes for everything he did or if even at a certain moment he chased after a chance to kill euro, but if he was really threatened by euro as everyone would have done, he rightfully got rid of him, Euronymous is not the ideologue you present him to be. A good musician yes, with few interesting points but an ideologue since when?
In conclusion I don't even know what triggered Euronymous to plan to kill Varg, if that is true, which seems to be. Only them would know the full story. Euronymous however seems to have had more reasons to kill Varg. Vikernes can't lie even if he wanted to on major details, read his story aswell.
Varg is responsible for setting fire ( not himself but through others) on 4 churches, I'm certain about that, but what that says about him and if that is so brave, and what were his indirect purposes, ideological or opportunistic or both, I can't say for sure. The thing is that you can't nail him down for Euronymous killing just like that.
Post a Comment